Plastic2Oil Inc (PTOI)

[loanranger]

"Or perhaps you meant a copy of two cover letters and a single summons......"
That's what I meant. Great catch!

".....readers of this board have only seen copies of a cover letter and 2 summonses, not the order itself...."
I should have said that the only things that have been posted to this board are copies of 2 cover letters referencing enclosed summonses and a copy of a single summons. I can't tell from here what readers of this board have seen other than what appears on this board, of course.
Another great catch!

"If I may ask, why did you opt to post the 04/04/12 cover letter from Mr. Hornberger separate from the 04/04/12 summons from Mr. Hornberger, and instead post Mr. Hornberger's 04/04/12 summons together with the 04/05/12 cover letter from Helen Daley? "
I didn't "opt" to post anything. I copied and pasted the links to the documents that had previously been provided, without alteration or editing, by a poster that I personally would not expect to fabricate a document.

I thought that the point of the post was simple enough.
I was responding to the following incorrect assertion:
"If it has anything to do with JBII whatsoever, it is required to describe so by the very regulations cited in the correspondence:"
The linked documents are not required to carry such a description. The order itself hasn't been posted to this board. Hence, the people that provided the documents, having neither identified themselves nor the contents of the order (at least we have had no proof of that ON THE BOARD) have not broken the law.

I "really do not know one way or another what the nature of the order is in the documents" that I have linked.

The evidence that I have seen.....which is limited to the evidence on this board and, of course, the allegations of the SEC complaint...which I don't perceive to be either coincidental or unfounded....lead me to believe that the order does, in fact, center around the activities of JB/JBI.

If you choose to believe that the documents aren't related to an order that involves an investigation of the activities of
JB/JBI, that's fine.....I'm sure whatever evidence you have of that provides you comfort that that is the case. I'll offer just one more anecdotal link, the contents of which I wouldn't vouch for but, if true, seem telling:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=74587468
"I forwarded that link to brent hornberger, he is doing the interveiws(sic) and was not happy stating that was supposed to be confidential information."

I'm sure that you agree that our perceptions aren't what matter. The answer to this question should be provided by the OSC, hopefully soon. I look forward to it and any comments that you might have about it.