INET...we finally agree on something
IMO it is all individual's opinions, and generally speaking it should all be taken with the proverbial grain of salt.
INET...I agree with your statement. (above)
Anyone taking to heart what is said on these boards ,pro and con,other than facts from the company deserves to be taken.
However, I totally disagree with this statement. (above) NO ONE deserves to be taken unless it's the "TAKERS".
I will be the first to admit that CDEX is not out of the woods yet,but as for being a scam,that's a crock!!!
You can't in all honesty say "but as for being a scam,that's a crock!!!" We don't have enough information to make that call! And when you look at the people involved (mostly the same players from LOCH) it's prudent to be suspicious.
Just remember the posts from P4316 and be sure to keep in mind that WP was letting HB (a liar who didn't even have a degree) lay claim to his great technology discovery. The only logical reason that makes any sense is HB was used as a patsy & scapegoat. One other thing that really bothers me is nowhere can I find how MP & WP were paid during the LOCH days. I doubt they were working for free! So how were they paid? Doesn't any of this not raise a red flag for you in light of the fact they just happen to be the ones taking over the reins of CDEX? Did they have to completely disassociate themselves from LOCH in order to head up CDEX? If so, how did they manage to do that? It looks more than suspicious to me. Maybe you see it differently. I'd like to hear your view on these unanswered questions.
AI
