Monday, April 09, 2012 11:49:54 PM
They trade well under book although my guess is that's a combination of the illiquidity and the potential to not be able to fully collect on what is owed them from the sale of Dacca and/or possibly legal risk.
Then again, it seems like they have a pretty clear case to collect that money if they can and it is hard to know what the liability side is with Triumph (if any ultimately).
And that's like $1.6+ million the Dacca buyer still owes. A big amount conisdering the very small market cap here.
An interesting spec play here IMO just doing some cursory glancing at it. It should be one to watch and see what happens both on the ops side in Q1 (from the rework done) and from the potential collections side if they can settle or collect on what is still owed them.
If they do both that would be interesting. Potentially a company trading at a fraction of book and being profitable in the O&G sector with low float and tiny market cap.
All IMO.
I don't mind stealing bread from the mouths of decadence... But I can't feed on the powerless when my cup's already overfilled.
-Temple of the Dog
Recent MHPC News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/11/2023 06:39:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/03/2023 07:00:18 PM
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM