InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 111
Posts 11523
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/21/2006

Re: 5dollars post# 175939

Sunday, 04/08/2012 7:28:41 PM

Sunday, April 08, 2012 7:28:41 PM

Post# of 312016
I suppose we can suppose, but this is a public company, and proof of concept attracts investment dollars. Since Bordynuik went to great lengths to extol the virtues of the magic catalyst in the early-going, complete with an intrepid saga of finding it on an old R2R tape, from the much touted massive engineering archive, wouldn't it strike you as odd that definitive proof of the catalyst's performance exists, but he chooses not to provide it given the potential investment dollars that would come his way? Wouldn't that be easier than "bolstering" the balance sheet with inflated media credits and risking an SEC investigation, if such definitive proof existed? I would imagine that control tests were done as doing them is a rudimentary step for a lab. It's a provocative proposition as to why no results are forthcoming however.

A steal machine isn't going to be wrecked by using a different catalyst, or no catalyst for a test. How could it be?

A test with the table top version is all that's needed.


Can we rule out with absolute certainty that john did not perform your suggested scientific experiment? Perhaps the result have stayed in house. Can we agree on that?