InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 358
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/23/2012

Re: wEaReLeGiOn post# 175928

Sunday, 04/08/2012 6:20:42 PM

Sunday, April 08, 2012 6:20:42 PM

Post# of 312016
You can't really be serious about such a request?

If it were me, and I had a catalyst that I know can produce results, why would I want to go through the trouble of doing what you are asking AND publish that for everyone else??
As I have stated before, JBI's process does not need to be reviewed like a Consumer Reports Test of this year's Washing Machines or microwave ovens. Even if it did perform "as well as a leading catalyst", wooop de shit, point is it WORKS!

If the other "leading catalyst" would work just as well, how come other companies that claim to be able to do P2O, are only able to make a "gel-like substance" resembling crude-oil, at a cost of 8-10 times that of JBI ? - seems to me that the JBI Catalyst works better than anything out there - most people just do not want to embrace that simple concept.

The process works, the catayst works, the SEC suit is dead, Liquid Gold is being loaded into tankers as we speak, waste-plastic is being reduced, and over 180 NYC lives are being saved this year.

JBI owes no one a breakdown of the catalyst. I couldn't care if the catalyst is fermented cat piss, it does NOT matter. I, as a stockholder, am confident that P2O works as advertised, if not better, and that we (JBI stockholders) will be enjoying the rewards of our DD.