Micro Imaging Technology Inc (MMTC)

[StrengthenNumbers]

Must we refute the lies again?






There is plenty of evidence, as you have been shown before, but for those who might happen upon your post and believe such nonsense, I will again post this supporting documentation by independent, official, and verifiable source.

http://ddr.nal.usda.gov/bitstream/10113/41910/1/IND44365309.pdf

REVIEWERS
TOM HAMMACK
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy, College
Park, MD 20740

1 Participants

METHOD AUTHORS
JOHN RICARDI, DAVID HAAVIG, and LASAUNTA CRUZ
Micro Imaging Technology, 970 Calle Amanecer, Suite F,
San Clemente, CA 92673

GEORGE PAOLI and ANDREW GEHRING
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research
Service, 600 East Mermaid Ln, Wyndmoor, PA 19038

SUBMITTING COMPANY
Micro Imaging Technology, 970 Calle Amanecer, Suite F,
San Clemente, CA 92673

INDEPENDENT LABORATORY
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research
Service, 600 East Mermaid Ln, Wyndmoor, PA 19038

Here's a nice tidbit from page 255 of this official government agency document:

"Results.—A perfect 18/18 score was recorded for the User
Guide-specified 1 h test for all bacteria. L. seeligeri also
scored perfectly (6/6) for all four deviations. B. subtillus
scored perfectly for 8 and 48 h deviations and 5/6 for 2 and 4 h
deviations. P. aeruginosa never scored above 3/6 on any of the
deviations, and L. monocytogenes had scores as low as 4/6 on
two deviations (Table 8)."