InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 62
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/04/2012

Re: I-Glow post# 11861

Wednesday, 04/04/2012 9:37:02 AM

Wednesday, April 04, 2012 9:37:02 AM

Post# of 12911
let me ask you this, for clarity's sake. you think AMWI is a shell because of who is related to who or who knows who? as well as the suspected involvement of PK? here's to clearing up something, according to the "six rules of separation" everyone knows everyone else. in other words, through six people i know you and vise versa but that doesn't mean i share your ideas and goals just like Mr. G and his relatives and PK. second, what you have is a cape of only theory tucked in to your waist band hoping to expel all the levels of wrong with AMWI. what myself and others have are cold hard evidence. we have press releases, CNN articles, Tech shows (not just in san fran but the one coming up in japan as well) we have an actual product, in fact we have multiple products by this company.so ask your self, if a shell or fake company was going to spend money rather than make money, would they even bother with such tech shows or traveling half way around the globe for "business". and here is a theory, if it was a shell, would they really publicize that they are developing a new kind of security for VOIP, knowing full well that with just that claim alone, they would be under the microscope from not only other big dog companies but the government as well,afterall that security feature would defeat the purpose of the patriot act . when you compare AMWI as a shell to all those others that were on the pinks and were shells, you will see one major problem; These dead in the water shells never had a product and never claimed to, they never traveled anywhere to they never started a Direct Response Television campaign nation wide.