InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252301
Next 10
Followers 15
Posts 1610
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/07/2010

Re: DewDiligence post# 139458

Friday, 03/30/2012 11:03:03 AM

Friday, March 30, 2012 11:03:03 AM

Post# of 252301

In the aggregate, which are a bigger problem for society: flawed studies, or useless studies?

LOL. That's easy, the "flawed" studies are much worse. At least the designers of useless studies don't pretend that their results will be useful.

You make a valid point, though. The system that funds patently useless study ideas is one that doesn't care about the ultimate value of study results, and the dishonest researchers that pretend to produce useful results, but don't, will continue to get funded. Michigan Congressman John Dingel made a run at this problem in the '90s, as have others since, but the problem seems to get worse and worse as the government's role in funding research continues to grow.

Possibly, the surest way to invest in research results into a therapy that is valid is in a start-up company that has been founded by the inventor of the compound. At least there, he's putting his money where his mouth is (assuming he didn't set the whole thing up as a way of defrauding potential big pharma buyers).

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.