Thanks. Either my coffee wasn't kicking-in yet, or its just over-my-pay-grade.
Even though I don't truely understand what is going on, or really, what the dance of electrons is being compared to, the GIF's were interesting. (The last one of the series was animating "Notchy" for some reason.)
Modeling molecules (And Atoms) is full of inconsistancy's, due to an inability to actually observe the actual structure. Inferances are made by observing force-interactions. I don't believe anyone really "Knows" exactly what forces cause what...
From wiki,
"complex post hoc distortions of the shape of the potential well to fit experimental data, but the question remains whether these mathematical manipulations actually correspond to the spatial deformations in real nuclei. Problems with the shell model have led some to propose realistic two-body and three-body nuclear force effects involving nucleon clusters and then build the nucleus on this basis. Two such cluster models are the Close-Packed Spheron Model of Linus Pauling and the 2D Ising Model of MacGregor"
Maybe some bright "Rising-Star" in the world of physics, will discover the reason that most of the suspected "missing-Mass" and surmized "dark-Matter" hasn't been observable...merely because it's at the "heart" of all matter.
And that could lead to other terms of force, "Long-force interactions" and "Short-force interactions"
The "short-force" interaction, being responsible for protons/neutrons to be superimposed (Occupying the same space) in a helium 4 molecule,
While the "Long-force" interactions causing the continued (And accelerating) expansion of the universe.
Food for thought, What a banquet!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
