Vertical Computer Systems Inc (fka VCSY)

[lbman]

courtesy of dabbler3248 on raging bull:


THIS is the best part of that article and I would think that ANY true VCSY shareholder would be very happy to see it. imo


The court was not persuaded by Interwoven’s arguments that the reexamination would result in a simplification of issues. The court noted that 66% of the time a reexamination will result in amendment and that between 11-12% of the time all claims are cancelled. However, the court noted that Interwoven filed ex parte reexamination requests, and not inter partes reexamination requests:


Unlike inter partes reexaminations which “are guaranteed to finally resolve at least some issues of validity because the requesting party is barred from seeking district court review on any grounds that it could have raised in reexamination,” no such estoppel arises from ex parte reexaminations. . . . Consequently, the only way Interwoven’s requested reexaminations will resolve invalidity issues is if the PTO cancels the claims in their entirety, of which there is only a 12% chance.


http://www.reexamlink.com/2012/03/declaratory-judgment-plaintiff-and-stays-pending-reexamination/#more-628

What would be nice now is some direction from Judge Seeborg (either up or down)