InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1204
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/19/2011

Re: gussbee1986 post# 11686

Saturday, 03/24/2012 4:53:22 PM

Saturday, March 24, 2012 4:53:22 PM

Post# of 28688
“gussbee” – BORK may have missed their chance for 1st entry to a few markets preparing for use of nanotech, like e-grid wire and nano-batteries.

I asked “John11” a few days ago whether BORK indeed had the industrial relationships claimed or alluded to in its’ website marketing materials. So far, there has been no reply or PR to that effect.

I’ve read the developments at Rice for some time. I kept silent on the BORK IHUB board about the Rice U. progress, hoping that BORK would get “there” first and deliver on the the promise of KRYRON quickly.

The Rice U. nano lab has already started or completed the kind of electrical conductivity testing that “Josyln Hi-Voltage” has been offering BORK for free since last summer, thanks to “ATL”. I can’t understand why BORK so far has passed on that offer. Rice is not waiting. I can't even imagine the revenue that product will bring to the Univ. for their patents and to the mfg. company that brings it to market - first.

Pratt & Whitney has been actively pursuing the chance to test KEYRON, also since last summer, thanks to “PWRon”. Lockheed–Martin has been assisting helping Rice since 2008.

I have no doubt P&W would assist BORK with financial assistance for samples and equipment should KRYRON prove viable for aerospace usage and turbine heat dissipation.

The prospects for BORK’s nanotech processes are proven and know few boundaries. Nanotech has been in development in college and industrial labs around the world, benefitting from gov't., NASA and privately funded R & D, like Locheed- MArtin and others.

BORK had a unique, SMALL window of opportunity to get to market FIRST with next generation technology, world–changing industrial products for e-grid and batteries.

Unless I am corrected, BORK’s 1st to market and partnering chances are receding rapidly and BORK has to self-fund every aspect of in-house production and R&D.

We all knew the “window” was not going to stay open forever and BORK needed to develop their foothold fast with strong market outreach and response.

Bork MAY BE TOO LATE. BORK mgmnt. may not have even been the main factor. Lack of funds and partnerships may be what we finally look back upon with regret.

Rice University Batteries:

http://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=23111

http://smarterplanet.tumblr.com/post/8343958149/nanowire-batteries-to-serve-as-power-source-for

Rice University Wire:

http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=42967

http://www.sigmascan.org/Live/Issue/ViewIssue/544/2