InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 153
Posts 12276
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 04/02/2007

Re: Lites2014 post# 172681

Saturday, 03/24/2012 12:30:21 AM

Saturday, March 24, 2012 12:30:21 AM

Post# of 312025
Sadly, this kind of "return volley" is expected from JBI. Are they attempting to incite shareholder backlash against Faruqi & Faruqi?

Thought that kind of rhetoric was confined to SMBs.

And as usual, the full context to: "... the Company has learned that the law firm representing the shareholder in this case was identified in a recent article published in Bloomberg BusinessWeek and reported to have recovered no damages on behalf of the shareholders they represented in ten shareholder suits filed in Delaware , and instead only recovered its legal fees and costs. ..."

was left out.

M&A Lawsuits: http://www.law.northwestern.edu/news/articleFull.cfm?id=230&db=NewDB

This is a Derivative Lawsuit: http://www.faruqilaw.com/cases/practice/area/2

Shareholder Derivative Litigation
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has extensive experience litigating shareholder derivative actions on behalf of the corporate entity. These actions are filed by a shareholder of a public company, but on behalf of the injured corporation, with any ultimate recovery flowing to the corporate entity, not its shareholders. This litigation is often necessary when the corporation has been injured, such as the wrongdoing by certain corporate officers in connection with stock-option backdating programs. A shareholder has the right to commence a derivative action when the company’s directors are unwilling, or unable, to pursue claims against the wrongdoers.

Derivative litigation, like shareholder merger litigation, usually asserts that corporate officers and/or directors breached fiduciary duties owed to the company. Because such wrongdoing is often the result of poor internal guidelines and procedures, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP attempts to structure comprehensive corporate governance changes in connection with the successful resolution of derivative litigation, in addition to any monetary recovery that may inure directly to the benefit of the company, and indirectly to its shareholders through an improved market price and market perception.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP prosecutes these derivative actions on a contingent fee basis.


I'd say not a bad settlement outcome from the 2 cases posted on the site: http://www.faruqilaw.com/settlement-notices

Having said that, IMHO SMB "alliance" split will be based on protection of company -vs- protection of management-- the latter has enjoyed the overwhelming majority to date, but there does appear to be tiny slivers of light beginning to penetrate the otherwise aphotic depths.