InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 80
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/06/2002

Re: LawyerLong post# 76894

Wednesday, 03/21/2012 6:32:14 PM

Wednesday, March 21, 2012 6:32:14 PM

Post# of 93822
I didnt see where they have made any changes in the claims? What I could tell is that they are asking the examiner to interpret the claim "coupled to a power supply" as describing a unique powering of the flash device using a MOSFET controlled by the processor. This sort of thing was not seen in the prior art and could be unique.

But I agree, if the patent is re-certified, there is too much Markman history and prior art to have any value anymore. Its a shame. Good whilst it lasted tho.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.