InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 151
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/14/2011

Re: None

Monday, 03/19/2012 2:41:24 AM

Monday, March 19, 2012 2:41:24 AM

Post# of 7602
I agree with MrC totally about what he posted. I was under the
impression NTCXF could reduce cost's by 60% anyway-no furnace; no
toxic chemicals; and could produce more energy especially with
the black silicon. Using R2R and the AR box, how many would be
needed for a 100 megawatt production--Twin Peak's no. is 16.
That sounds like a LOT to me..Wonder what they had to give up for
the financing ?? Maybe we will know in a few days. If it was up to
these "talking heads" on T.V., Solar wouldn't even be around..
Any comments they make are done in a very deprecating manner-
Heard one (who has quite a following, by the way) last week, say,
and I quote-"I don't even talk about Solar; Nat Gas is the only
way to go". When the powers that be find out how really dangerous
this "fracking" is, nat gas will not be so cheap. A very short
time ago, it was 6 times more expensive than it is today. Well,
that's my 30-All I have is time anyway-All my money is invested.