1.25 Class 10B Subordinated Notes means, collectively, (a) the 6.375% Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2052, issued pursuant to the Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 17, 2003, between LBHI and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as trustee; (b) the 6.375% Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due October 2052, issued pursuant to the Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 31, 2003, between LBHI and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as trustee; (c) the 6.00% Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2053, issued pursuant to the Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 22, 2004, between LBHI and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as trustee; (d) the 6.24% Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2054, issued pursuant to the Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 18, 2005, between LBHI and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as trustee; (e) the 5.75% Subordinated Notes due 2017, issued pursuant to the Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 24, 2006, between LBHI and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as trustee; (f) the Fixed and Floating Rate Subordinated Notes Due 2032, issued pursuant to the Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2007, between LBHI and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as trustee; (g) the 6.50% Subordinated Notes Due 2017, issued pursuant to the Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 19, 2007, between LBHI and The Bank of New York, as trustee; (h) the 6.875% Subordinated Notes Due 2037, issued pursuant to the Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 19, 2007, between LBHI and The Bank of New York, as trustee; (i) the 6.75% Subordinated Notes Due 2017, issued pursuant to the Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 21, 2007, between LBHI and The Bank of New York, as trustee; and (j) the 7.50% Subordinated Notes Due 2038, issued pursuant to the Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 9, 2008, between LBHI and The Bank of New York, as trustee.
EDIT: To your question. The answer is no, I don't believe so. Reason: Too far out of the money. At 18% recovery, they would be have to come up with approx. 4 times more for recovery for CTs.
That would mean the A&M and Weil were off by 400%, which I doubt that would happen.
