InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,815.26
(
-0.76%
)
US TECH 100
19,657.20
(
0.12%
)
Dow Jones
42,740.42
(
-0.75%
)
Brent Oil
74.10
(
-0.50%
)
Bitcoin
67,439.38
(
0.64%
)
Post# of 93824
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

LawyerLong

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 1
Posts 1794
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2001

LawyerLong

Re: Sentinel post# 29268

Monday, 02/03/2003 11:07:26 PM

Monday, February 03, 2003 11:07:26 PM

Post# of 93824
Sent - chess makes in the post after yours the obvious point. Zack's entire premise is unfounded. (Actually his entire life appears to be unfounded). EDIG is not a one product, one source of income company. He needs to re-write the same hypothesis about 10 more times, each time plugging in a different source of income. Or (of course he's evidently not as smart as Chess) add them all together.

And we should not forget that we don't even know everything that's going on. Didn't I read something about a signed contract with an OEM - what are the revenues from that? when do they begin flowing? etc etc etc.

Zack needs a few spin lessons from TorF.

LL

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up