InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 42
Posts 5996
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/19/2009

Re: iblong2 post# 19425

Wednesday, 03/14/2012 4:27:56 PM

Wednesday, March 14, 2012 4:27:56 PM

Post# of 22918
I'm not wrong I've done real DD. There will be separation of money from shareholders to the company for the fact that every dirty detail will come with and effect any "new" "company". (both terms very loosely given and both just misleading labels).

Actually I do know what I'm talking about, and it is foolish to think of this SEC and DTCC hammer as nothing, because factually they are a lot!

Please, can anyone provide confirmed links to what exactly the attorney is doing, list of what any fees are for, and who he is really working for (meaning the list of insiders, who owns, who is owed, what and how much. And I don't believe for one second that he mainly for shareholders). No, PRs or insider statements are not confirmed links.

Post away at copies of the filings or "process" that the attorney is doing. Merely statements by the company or insiders are complete nonsense. Lets see some documents of what the attorney is doing with that 15(c)211 process. If the insiders aren't worried about future litigation, well then they are complete fools also. But I think they are worried, and there is multitude of legal statements about getting an attorney to deal with SEC implications especially after a suspension and past litigation and convictions in connection with the shell.

Anyone can refer to the SEC link, they will not tell anyone if a investigation is ongoing and it's only common sense to have an attorney for the extreme risk of that after a SEC suspension. jeez There has already been charges and convictions to the insiders of this shell. Oh that's right, it's in the past and this is a "new" group. Riight. Lets see some proof of that even. Some figurehead on the OTCmarkets or some cheap Nevada state filing on some different named entity than the stock itself is not the proof I'm talking about.

Again, if it was in the past of the shell, one will have to use the word "more". I know that the insiders want the public to ignore that there is nothing but bad business or more scammy insiders that even wants to look at past scammy shells, good business is smart enough to get cleaner business. That's why once a dirty shell, always a dirty shell in pinky land.

I wasn't the one who just was doing "grouping" and saying ANWM was only included in some boiler plate special. Guess what, if they were included in that special, it's only common sense that they could "mistakenly" (LOL) get included in the litigation that are with that group. There already has been litigation with the "group", so again the word "more" is appropriate.

It's the other way round with the SEC, there has to be proof that there isn't a investigation and no further litigation. There is no transparency coming from this ticker and the only thing people can do is contact the SEC with their particular situation. I suggest for anyone to contact the SEC, file MORE complaints, and try to get informed with them as much as possible (which won't be much).
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73141052

Any defense for the dirty ticker can't be backed up with anything and all proof lies with the "company". Until they do that, which I suspect they won't have any full disclosures, they are just a POS with odds of MORE litigation or MORE DTCC actions than ever coming back to screw investors again with some gold scheme or any real ability for shareholders to get much out of their shares. The insiders will just have to go somewhere else to do their dirty deeds in a completely different shell (which is what happens so many times with this dirty goo).


Seems like the company insiders need to do the waking up. I'm not the one in la la land or wants to ignore the implications to the SEC or DTCC or the indications of more investigating. I'm not the one who wants to ignore that there is total lack of any positive substance to the dirty shell. Where is all the proof of anything this figurehead that is spoke of has done with anything of any substance other than get an SEC suspension and DTC restriction?

Wrong again! I suggest that you do your own DD!


DON'T FEED THE CLOWNS


THE REAL DTCC DISCUSSION
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.