Thursday, August 11, 2005 5:17:30 PM
I read the story on PP.
This is a little confusing. Phonifier says they are using a Creative Commons License. If I understand correctly, the Creative Commons License is for non-profit and non-commercial use. Yet, ShotCode (OP3) clearly is a for profit business. Are they miss-using the Creative Commons License? I also see in the pwc ShotCode interview that Scanbuy says, OP3 is a partner representing Scanbuy’s technology in its region, focusing on integration of our technology in Fortune 1000 and mobile operators. Does OP3 need Scanbuy anymore? Are NeoMedia's patents being blatantly violated? Does this mean, as an individual, I can use the software for free to scan a ShoteCode on an advertisement, connect to a business website, and buy tickets for a concert bypassing all copyrights and patents? Or, does a for-profit company using ShotCodes have to pay a licensing fee to cross the bridge?
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM