InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,469.30
(
0.39%
)
US TECH 100
19,175.20
(
0.00%
)
Dow Jones
39,112.16
(
-0.76%
)
Brent Oil
84.61
(
0.50%
)
Bitcoin
61,565.51
(
-0.40%
)
Post# of 8307
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

fbrutus

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 116
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/07/2010

fbrutus

Re: linda1 post# 6851

Monday, 03/12/2012 11:15:52 PM

Monday, March 12, 2012 11:15:52 PM

Post# of 8307
They may see it that way if they ignore the whole picture.
I’m hoping they rule the transfer of the litigation to JPM without the warrant holders interest is reversed, and there was a definite conflict of interest when the Court allowed Artful Steinberg to represent both Dime Class and JPM in a claim to the litigation award.
We can only hope.
A very long shot, unless there are deep pocket holdouts ready to take up the cause.
IMO
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up