InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 384
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/21/2011

Re: Dwill2 post# 4006

Monday, 03/12/2012 3:09:29 PM

Monday, March 12, 2012 3:09:29 PM

Post# of 62039
In fact, there are a few interesting things about the LOI that gives me further questions now that we're in Mid March....

Even if SIRG signs an LOI for funding TOMORROW... how are they going to transfer the money to Medina owed at closing ($750,000) by march 19th (or within 10 days)? Considering the signing of the FUNDING LOI will be a material event, we would HAVE to see an 8k on that within a week. So I'm assuming that hasn't happened yet. Since I'm assuming that hasn't happened... it's not like they can sign an LOI for funding, and turn around and transfer $750K within a week or within 17 days? So basically what I'm saying is, if they didn't already 8k that we've got a funding LOI, then it's going to be impossible to make the March 19th (+10) deadline.
Rod will have to communicate that the signing of the funding LOI pushes back the agreement with Medina until they can transfer the funds as I highly doubt that the Funding LOI will have $750K in good faith money.

on the flip side it doesn't say on the 10% purchase LOI that the deal is void if it hasn't been closed within 10 days of March 19th. There is wording in there that states that MPG (Medina) can not sell/negotiate their Chloride Copper mine during the timeframe of the LOI. So after the extension, etc, Medina could shop the 10% elsewhere OR the deal could still be closed w/SIRG regardless of the 10 days elapsing.

added to my other 2 cents, that makes 4 cents

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.