InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 2173
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/23/2010

Re: sirhaggus post# 56029

Monday, 03/12/2012 2:09:57 PM

Monday, March 12, 2012 2:09:57 PM

Post# of 60937
Agree. It doesn't make any sense. For the stock to be worth just several cents assumes that the patent has no sale value. That's incoherent. Unless we get the sense that the Receiver will violate the Judge's order and give away the company's patents. What is your current feeling about how the Receiver is maximizing the value of the company assets now that we are into the second month of receivership?



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.