mttm, you wrote: "Also it is part of the job description to anticipate delays - don't promise what you can't deliver."
That statement cuts two ways. Since delays are to be expected, it also means that when management makes a declaration of what's expected, shareholders have to hear it with the understanding that delays may occur. We shouldn't be taking an expected date as gospel. It's just as a good-faith expectation of what they hope will be happening, barring unforeseen events.
As I have said before, we can't on the one hand demand more news about where things stand and what is expected in the coming months, and then get bent out of shape when unexpected glitches come up.
I agree with you 100% that this could have been handled better by communicating more quickly and clearly. Because of this I suggested to Bruce that maybe they could introduce an "IR Corner" on the website, where Bruce could post on a fairly regular basis, maybe twice a month, just to keep a flow of info coming, without the expense of a PR.
In general, Medizone needs to be more sensitive to the message that is being heard, not just the message that they feel they want to say. That is the essence of marketing.
