InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 3893
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/28/2005

Re: pennstreet post# 37643

Friday, 03/09/2012 3:07:12 PM

Friday, March 09, 2012 3:07:12 PM

Post# of 45771
"I wonder what really is the rule when the USPTO makes an error. Just wondering."

The rule is that CDEx is at fault, I already cited the USPTO policy remember?

"Failure to receive notice of fees due does not shift the burden of compliance from the patentee to the USPTO" (paraphrased).

Based on the IP assets listed in the BK filing, Mr. Brumfield allowed 3 trademark applications, the Valimed patent and 2-3 patent applications lapse under his watch as CEO.

"The patent mess has been taken care of my Mr. Brumfield and the Cdex patent Attorney. Let the internet catch up to the facts and all eggs can be removed."

You failed to mention the trademark 'mess', but that's OK. Good thing I called the 'mess' to your attention otherwise it would never of got cleaned-up.

I feel that a 'thank you d4diddy' is in order.

Mrs. Amorosi will be pleased.



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.