DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

Fair enough.

We have established that Kondragunta is eyecolor0.

We have the public record of his brief flurry of posts, and we have some interesting information contained in them.

On the one hand, we know that eyecolor had an axe to grind due to his perception of his treatment. We must therefore review the information with some degree of skepticism due to that bias. In fact there are certain statements within those posts that we know to be lies.

On the other hand, we also know that a considerable amount of the information was correct. It has either been verified by board members or confirmed via subsequent documents from the company.

We tend to view Kndragunta through the lens presented by the company and through the writing of Stockpimpdaddy. Given what we have seen, that may not be an unbiased source either.

Perhaps if we take the statements of both and run them through the same skeptical filters, and compare it to what we can verify externally, we can extract some value from them.

regards,
frog