DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

Gunnabe, LOL Last word indeed!

You are flailing now pal.

Listen to yourself, you have already accepted the proof.

You said as much. Something about IF the public record agrees that the email was a part of the injunction....then I am correct.

My proof is infallible, you know it, and you are now trying to skate around it. Good Luck.(chortle)

Here are the three parts involved in proving that a DNAP Vice president named Tony Frudakis as StockpimpDaddy.

-Kondragunta is/was a Vice president. Fact

-Eyecolor0 said StockpimpDaddy is Tony Frudakis. Fact

-Eyecolor0 is Kondragunta. Fact

It is impossible to avoid the conclusion and therefore the proof.

The only wiggle room you have,is the issue of the court documents that connect Kondragunta directly to eyecolor0. (Even though the connection is obvious, and known to anyone familiar to the company.)

That documentation is also a fact, whether I produce it or not.

The proof is complete, you have no logical response. You can deny the existence of the court procedings, but that is foolish. You can try to put the burden on me to produce the documents but you already tried it and it didn't work.

You might even try to create an alternate scenario to explain the facts, but the thing is so simple and direct that you can't. Better to just fade away and pretend this conversation never happened, and resolve, for the last time, never to give that damn frog an opening again.LOL