I did catch that. IMO, the halt for the death really screwed up the events and timing of this trial, making all assumptions in stat analysis entirely irrelevant (if stat analysis wasnt already).
Too many variables to map out anything, too many unknowns.
I still think this has a very good shot at showing statistical significance in the final analysis, albeit, along the lines of what Dew said -----not, a knock the cover off the ball type of showing.
As I asked someone else, is it possible that you could have had a 6 month OS advantage at the 2IA, and still not have reach an SPA endpoint because the p - and HR was too high of a hurdle?
