InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 1474
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/25/2010

Re: Southern Gal post# 7743

Tuesday, 03/06/2012 11:44:26 AM

Tuesday, March 06, 2012 11:44:26 AM

Post# of 15274
..."I am happy to have another attorney join the fight."???...you're happy to be divvying up your shareholder equity -- presuming you are a shareholder, of course -- in order to handle the fees of another attorney?...particularly, of another attorney who specializes in things like the problems "snore formula" had with the FTC:

http://www.ftc.gov/os/closings/staff/snoreformula.pdf

...say what:

"As you know, the staff determined that certain advertisements...make health benefit claims for dietary supplements for which Part III of the order requires substantiation. In lieu of submitting substantiation for these claims, you have confirmed that the respondents have stopped disseminating this exhibit, and have ceased promotion of their products."

...well, that's good!...he helped them confirm that they had stopped "disseminating" their "claims" since, evidently, they couldn't provide the "substantiation" requested...

...then there was him representing "MPA":

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/co-court-of-appeals/1500242.html

...where the state of Colorado attorney general said "MPA":

"(b) Knowingly makes a false representation as to the source, sponsorship, approval, or certification of goods, services, or property;

(c) Knowingly makes a false representation as to affiliation, connection, or association with or certification by another;

(d) Uses deceptive representations or designations of geographic origin in connection with goods or services;

(e) Knowingly makes a false representation as to the characteristics, ingredients, uses, benefits, alterations, or quantities of goods, food, services, or property or a false representation as to the sponsorship, approval, status, affiliation, or connection of a person therewith."

...I think that one is still pending...but I dunno if Claude's results here would help CTTC:

http://www.mlmlaw.com/library/cases/mlm/ftc/nvi2agr.htm

...where it was ordered that the:

"...respondent, directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, in connection with the manufacturing, labeling, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of any product in or affecting commerce, shall not represent, in any manner, expressly or by implication, that the experience represented by any USER TESTIMONIAL or endorsement of the product REPRESENTS THE TYPICAL OR ORDINARY EXPERIENCE of members of the public who use the product..."

...the highlighting is mine...I mean, that could affect quite a few of the clinics listed on the calmarett site -- couldn't it?...

...anyway, I guess it's your equity and if you want to spend it on him, it's your business...hopefully, CTTC will NEED HIM for something...

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.