RIght is Right

[gp100357]

No, you're addressing a different issue than ws I. As it stands now, Mama's word, with any backup, is nothing more than mama being upset at her daughter. There's no 'back up' in what mama is saying or doing.

Do I think he was having contact with her while she was a minor? Probably was.

Is there any probable cause to confiscate his computer? Not based on what has been posted here, or what I have read.

The girl is now 18. She says nothing happened. He says nothing happened. Mama's is not legally involved in anything at this point .... She's mad, frustrated, pissed off, upset, embarrassed, etc ..... but that's not probable cause. IF she can give the authorities something real to work with, then they can pursue it.

I haven't even checked what the age of consent is in the state where this is occurring. It could be 16, or even 15 or 14 ...... if it is ..... mama has to have something to show, or at least give probability to the claim, that something happened before the girl reached that age.

Sucks, but that's the way it is. the teacher is a scumbag. Most sex offenders are very manipulative - that's how they 'work' their victims. But legal and 'right' aren't always the same either ... and this just seems wrong. Even if it might be legal.