I think think that mentioning that the 363 transfer at bk was illegal is the crux of our case. The 2 letters support that claim. It is irrelevant as to who took the prosecution obligation as that will be determined by J. Block.
The confiscation of property without due process is what is claimed here. The intricacies of the contract (Warrant agreement) should never have been a subject of Walrath's court. That whole charade is moot in the face of the 363 transfer.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.