InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 4446
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/05/2008

Re: Stef07 post# 34

Wednesday, 02/29/2012 2:15:35 PM

Wednesday, February 29, 2012 2:15:35 PM

Post# of 143
That's the joke. There is no infrastructure on the mining property at all.

This is strait from their site.

Infrastructure

Excellent infrastructure with highway 67 to edge or property
Mining friendly, politically safe jurisdiction.
Power grid along Highway 67
Town of Marfa 49 miles North of property
South Orient Railroad and Airport in Presidio, Texas (23 miles)



There is absolutely no infrastructure on site, not even a run power line and pole to the proposed mining location, nothing.

It's a farce as you don't call an airport 23 miles away and the town of Marfa 49 miles through the desert infrastructure, then to say this below doesn't even make sense

Excellent infrastructure with highway 67 to edge or property
Mining friendly, politically safe jurisdiction.



This doesn't even make sense and says nothing.

And then the power line? Wait till they tap into it if they can. For a mining operation a substation would need to be in place. That;s infrastructure not a power line running down a highway. Good Lord.

They may as well call Fort Worth infrastructure in place.

A generator running a light is not infrastructure just the same.

On another note.

The property was worked by several major companies (ASARCO, Phelps Dodge, Amax and Duval) between 1955 and 1972. Most of the drilling (88 holes in total) took place in 1970-71 under the operatorship of Duval Corporation. In 1997, the Rio Grande Mining Company conducted Pre-Feasibility studies aimed at determining the viability of extracting the shallow historic copper resources previously identified at Red Hills. At the time of Rio Grande's evaluation the price of copper was $ 0.80 per pound.



So is this what the NI 43 101 is based off of because they clearly say;

Note these are historic estimates which have not been verified by a QP and should not be relied upon.



Then this garbage.

Based on historic drilling, the following targets have been identified:

1) A molybdenum (copper) porphyry system which occupies a horseshoe shaped zone approximately 1000 m long and 200 m wide. Most of the previous drill holes within this zone were stopped at an average depth of 430 feet (131 metres) while still in mineralization. Only five holes were drilled past the 1,000 foot (305 m) depth. All intersected molybdenum mineralization from top to bottom. The deepest hole (Duval 7), which was drilled to a vertical depth of 2106 feet (642 metres) averaged 0.076% Mo throughout. The Red Hills moly porphyry target is open in two directions and at depth.



Identified? Really? by what means, where's the coordinates. Until actual coordinates, nothing has been identified.

When they are pushing out garbage to attract investors is a huge red flag. Had any infrastructure really been in place outside of the town 49 miles away which they consider infrastructure. Then just maybe they might have something.

Until real infrastructure is in with proper roads, drainage, lighting, power substation, water supply etc... I wouldn't get my hopes up as they pushed a sloppy pr on a whim way before the horse even showed up from his long journey back from the companies very own infrastructure town of Marfa.

Real infrastructure on a mining site requires permits and being OSHA compliant meaning inspections and regulations and that isn't even for mining which is another permitting process.

This is far from anything concrete.

http://www.toscamining.com/s/RedHills.asp





Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.