InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 51
Posts 13754
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/12/2008

Re: mz157 post# 254272

Tuesday, 02/28/2012 10:35:25 AM

Tuesday, February 28, 2012 10:35:25 AM

Post# of 363141
Exactly. That is why companies go out and get NSAI reports. They are an independent third party who has no reason to hype what their findings show so it covers a company's butt.

But what some STILL do not seem to understand is that many of the numbers reported are unrisked AND they are resource ESTIMATES not reserves. In order for unrisked resource estimates to be accurate every single well drilled would have to be commercial. Every single one of them. That is why risked resoucre estimates should always be used instead. They take into account the high probability that some wells won't be commercial.

And then on top of that these are resource ESTIMATES. Only drilling can really uncover the amount of oil in the ground. So many people just misinterpret NSAI numbers. Whenever anyone asks how the NSAI numbers were so wrong, I would respond how can people read into the numbers things which the NSAI reports do not say. 15 billion in unrisked resource numbers became 15 billion in reserves. When in acutality the risked numbers were probably more like 3 or 4 billion. I am still hoping we can get to that number. That was the most likely outcome when drilling started and I hope it still is.