InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1294
Posts 45942
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 07/16/2005

Re: pennyprince2010 post# 43384

Tuesday, 02/21/2012 12:16:27 PM

Tuesday, February 21, 2012 12:16:27 PM

Post# of 141621
I'm not arguing the viabilty of a T-cig. My point is whether RFMK really/currently has what it takes to execute.

Think about it: RFMK, consultants on DTCC matters, gets womped by the DTCC. They lose credit rating (not to mention competency confidence) and ability to raise funds because of this. This is a publicly traded company relying solely on raising funds publicly. Gen 1 is admittedly inferior to Gen 2, if they even get it right the second time around. RFMK stated they had sufficient capital to see them thru Gen 1 with revenues carrying themselves forward. BUT, Gen 1 isn't viable, or else the MASSIVE market woulda signed a contract in a heartbeat. It got laughed at though. Hence the need for a Gen 2.

So, we have RFMK spending their available funds on Gen 1, a non-viable product. Publicly traded Gen 2 needs to be produced. Who's gonna pay for it?

IHub's Most Marked Board: investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=7489

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.