"Honestly I haven't found anything...sneeky or underhanded..
since CDEX was born...the key word is CDEX... "
LMAO!!!!!!
Absolute hogwash Pokster! All I can think of is either you haven't been around long OR you're a substantial PP investor with some truly unbelievable BS!! Anything for money eh? It's true, everything fades away with time, but you're gunna have to wait a lot longer before investors forget the sneeky, underhanded ways CDEx has conducted itself! (I've told you this already.)
HERE'S A FEW OFF THE CUFF:
Who incorporated CDEx?
Who signed a legal agreement for both CDEx and Loch on the same document?
Who hired MP as a consultant to CDEx?
Who signed the APA for CDEX where there was no guarantee for a distribution?
What lawyer failed to include certain clauses in the APA, but instead, claimed (in a CEO statement) it was an ad hoc verbal agreement with Boone?
Why was a CDEx PP investor that was also involved in the DA/CA lawsuits against Loch answering MP's personal emails?
Why did MP suddenly become wary (allegedly) of x-rays and favor the UV version of the EM-1 instead of the x-ray version even though the x-ray version was claimed to see thru materials better?
Say, how's the x-ray patent app coming along that was filed in 2003? Remember, the very first one with the claims of a portable XRF instrument. A lawyer I talked to just shook his head when he read those claims knowing that manufacturers of portable XRF equipemnt already exist. You suppose that CDEx wasn't aware of that? Why else go to all that trouble to file a patent application? It just doesn't make sense. (Or does it? TM- Homer Simpson)
Who claimed there were "no known obstacles left" for the marketing of the EM-1 or it's cousin the PSSS?
Who started marketing the PSSS yet never sold a single one?
More importantly, why did CDEx go to all the trouble of building a PSSS mock-up and a couple brochures if they knew that it was already rejected by the Army?
Why did CDEX spend so much time publishing all the reports about how well the EM-1 worked yet abandoned it completely?
Why did CDEx never publish the integration time, stand-off distance, and footprint all simultaneously IF THE TECHNOLOGY WAS SOOOOOO REVOLUTIONARY?
Why did the U.S. ARMY allegedly (I say allegedly because MP never stated it for the record) have to tell MP that the tech wasn't good enough?
WHERE IS THE REVOLUTIONARY TECHNOLOGY AND WHAT EXACTLY IS IT??? The current application of Valimed can be performed by many manufacturer's instruments IMO.
Kidinsight claimes that it is easily discernible by reading the patent applications. If that's true, then Kidinsight should have had no problem explaining it to the board in laymen's terms that investors can understand. I just can't figure out why he's never done that! LOL!!!!
YAAAAAAWN..... Oh how I could go on and on and on......
Maybe someone else would like to add one of their favoite sneeky, underhanded deeds of CDEx, there's plenty to go around!
Rottenapple, don't you have documented proof of some of them?
deefer
AI
