I have read the agreements you speak of. I have also read the so called weasel clauses and easy outs for insiders. The key thing to remember when reading those agreements is that the agreements are not in compliance with the law which make the agreements mute in a court of law if Fortress was sued by its investors.
For example; You and I sign an agreement to burglarize a 7-Eleven store. We add weasel clauses and easy outs. We agree to divide the money evenly, agree to pay the driver of the get away car, agree to pay the accountant, agree to pay the gun store owner, agree to deposit the loot in a specific bank, and finally agree that law enforcement must release us immediately in lieu of prosecution if we are captured.
Would that be a legal agreement that a Federal court would uphold? No it would not be. What you must understand is that businesses like Fortress Financial write agreements all day everyday but that does not make the agreements legal. The agreements written and signed by Fortress ad its principals do not appear legal. Fortress cannot simply take your money and not return it if Fortress failed to comply with the law. If Fortress failed to pay you due to its willful non compliance with the law, then Fortress is negligent thus liable for the lost of your money. If fortress had complied with the law, maybe your investment would have eventually appreciated and or increased in value.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
no one has sued FFGO
there are no grounds to sue them .. the Divvy/NSS believed everything the fluff PR's, 8K's and website claimed .. each and every fluffy PR, 8K and agreement were full of weasel clauses and easy outs for the insiders
everyone was well warned years ago this was going to happen .. and they would lose every sub penny invested in
FFGO
and NMGL
