To 427Cobra: you make some very good points, based on that line of reasoning it is logical for one to conclude that NV is a legitimate company and investment. In fact, it would probably entice many potential investors. However, on the flip side, how does one explain the multitude of missed deadlines and past failures! That makes then look either deceptive or incompetent (very bad either way). One argument would be the lack of past funding. Let me ask you one thing: if they miss this upcoming year end deadline again with no fpga (lets say even into 1st quarter next year), then how would you feel about NVEI? At some point you must take into cosideration that NV may not really be what it appears or what they have lead investors to believe, imo.
Disclaimer: all my posts are my opinion
1,000,000 - 2,300,000 - 4,000,000
![](//img379.imageshack.us/img379/301/starwheeluniqueqv4.jpg)