InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 45
Posts 6149
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/18/2005

Re: None

Thursday, 08/04/2005 7:36:59 AM

Thursday, August 04, 2005 7:36:59 AM

Post# of 8201
Boston Scientific buys competitive advantage
by Dr. John L. Faessel

ON THE MARKET
858 587 8590
Dr.Faessel@onthemar.com


10Q says 3% to 5% goes to Biophan from stent sales – Boston’s Q2 stent sales were $700 million.

Biophan Technologies, Inc. (BIPH) $2.80 OTCBB
Market-cap $207 million

Boston Scientific Corp (BSX) $28.39 NYSE

Market-cap $23.6 billion

Yesterday Biophan announced the receipt of $5.75 million in investments and technology licensing payments from medical device manufacturer Boston Scientific. The license agreement grants Boston Scientific licenses covering patents related to Biophan’s MRI safety and image compatibility technologies.

Here is the key part of the deal: According to the Biophan 10-Q filed on 7-27-2005 re the Boston Scientific License. *See my handle on how this relates to some huge numbers for Biophan below.

“The agreement provides Boston Scientific with the right to use Biophan's MRI safety and image compatibility technology and other technologies in a broad range of exclusive and non-exclusive product areas at royalty rates of 3% to 5%. The exclusive product area includes vascular implants and the non-exclusive product area covers a broad array of products including guidewires, catheters, pacemakers, defibrillators, neurostimulators and others. Boston Scientific has the right to sub-license the exclusive product areas to third parties, with Biophan and Boston Scientific to share all proceeds from these parties.”

*So, Boston Scientific who does about $1.5 to $2 billion in stent (vascular implant) business agrees to pay Biophan royalties of 3% to 5%.

Here are some theoretical numbers that make the bullish case for Biophan.

Of course, the ‘when’ part of the implementation by Boston Scientific is unknowable at this point. But suffice it to say that the potential numbers are very large.

· $1.5 billion, times 3% equals revenue of $45,000,000.

· At $1.5 billion, times 5% equals revenue of $75,000,000.

· At $2 billion, times 3% equals revenue of $60,000,000.

· At $2 billion, times 5% equals revenue of $100,000,000.

Last quarter [Q2] Boston Scientific (BSX) did worldwide coronary stent sales that totaled $700 million, an increase of 7% from Q2 2004. (BSX) expects their drug-eluting stent sales to exceed $2.8 billion in 2005.

· $2.8 billion, times 3% equals revenue of $84,000,000.

· $2.8 billion, times 5% equals revenue of $140,000,000.

And they will sub-license rights to third parties – says the 10Q.

Furthermore - this does not include the potential sales of MRI safety technology for the ‘other’ implantable devices that are out there that need the protective coatings, like Vena Cava filters.

The solution technologies that Boston Scientific purchased from Biophan are coatings that shield the objects from the strong electromagnetic radio waves that are created during the MRI scan. Without such shielding the electromagnetic fields could induce high current to heat the metal implants and damage tissues surrounding them, which have proved fatal.

There is an extreme risk in the use of implanted metal devices as far as safety in MRI is concerned. Each patient is questioned about implanted objects before any MRI procedure is undertaken.

An absolute in business is that competitive advantage yields increased market share; and the brilliant and astute Boston Scientific management just purchased a significant head start on their competition. In licensing Biophans MRI safety solutions Boston Scientific, one of the world’s premier companies and most innovative medical device manufacturers, acquired cutting edge assets in the form of technologies that give them a new competitive advantage and sets them apart from all of the competition. Importantly, these newly acquired solutions have applications across several of Boston Scientific product lines.

Could you just imagine the scenario where, if ‘you’ needed a stent, you would select one that ‘would not’ allow you to undergo MRI?

Biophan is a world leader in the development of next-generation biomedical technology. They develop and market cutting-edge technologies designed to make biomedical devices safe and compatible within the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) environment. Biophan holds virtually all the issued patents that cover MRI safety.

Boston Scientific is a worldwide developer, manufacturer and marketer of medical devices whose products are used in a broad range of interventional medical specialties. Their gross revenues for 2004 were $3.47 billion, up from $2.91 billion in 2003. Boston Scientific affirmed its guidance for 2005, saying, “it's on track to earn $2 a share on revenue of $6.5 billion”.

It is conservatively estimated that over $12 billion in medical devices are shipped each year that could utilize Biophan’s proprietary technology. In 2003 there were approximately 10,000 magnetic resonance imaging ‘MRI’ units worldwide, and approximately 75 million MRI scans per year are performed. The dramatic increases in both MRI usage and cardiac device-based therapy have resulted in an estimated 50% - 75% probability of a patient being indicated for an MRI over the lifetime of their device. According to the Cleveland Clinic a world-wide population of 4.3 million people has pacemakers. Theta reports reported that 2002 cardiovascular devices were a $12.8 billion global industry that will grow on average of 12% per year through 2006, when it will be worth $22.6 billion.

The closure of the Boston Scientific deal with Biophan that was announced yesterday included the purchase of $5 million of Biophan’s common stock, - priced at a 10% premium over the average of the closing price for the 30 calendar-day period prior to the closing. Biophan also received an upfront payment of $750,000. And importantly (per the 10-Q) the $750,000 will not be an offset to future earned royalties. The technology license also includes annual maintenance fees, in addition to royalties and milestone payments on sales of products that employ Biophan-licensed technologies.

To see yesterday’s (BIPH) press release regarding the deal - visit: http://www.biophan.com/pr/2005/08/080305_Boston.html

Biophan (BIPH) is one of my Best Small-Cap Ideas for 2005. For the complete list, e-mail request to Dr.Faessel@onthemar.com


To remove – onthemar@yahoo.com

_____________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer: ON THE MARKET is not a registered Investment Adviser or a Broker/Dealer. Readers are advised that the information in this report is commentary issued solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy. The opinions and analyses included herein are based from sources believed to be reliable and written in good faith, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied is made as to their accuracy, completeness or correctness. Owners, employees and writers may have positions in the securities that are discussed in the newsletter. Readers are urged to consult with their own independent financial advisors with respect to any investment. All information contained in this report should be independently verified with the companies mentioned. Readers are cautioned that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that they may lose all or a portion of their investment if they make a purchase. Certain of the statements in this commentary may be considered forwarded looking statements. ON THE MARKET makes no representation and provides no assurance or guaranty that such forward looking statements will prove to be accurate. Statements of opinion and belief are those of the authors and/or editors of this report, and are based solely upon the information possessed by such authors and/or editors; no inference should be drawn that such authors or editors have any special or greater knowledge about the company or companies profiled or any particular expertise in the industries or markets in which the profiled company or companies compete. The reader should verify all claims and complete his own due diligence before investing in any securities of profiled company or companies. ON THE MARKET makes no recommendation that the purchase of securities of company or companies profiled in this report are suitable or advisable for any person or that an investment such securities will be profitable. In general, given the nature of the company or companies profiled and the lack of an active trading market for their securities, investing in such securities is highly speculative and carries a high degree of risk. An investor in such securities should be prepared and able to bear a loss of his or her entire investment. Nothing in this report should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities of any profiled company. ON THE MARKET has been retained to provide commentary for the company profiled in this report and receives compensation for those services. ON THE MARKET undertakes no obligation to inform readers about the ownership or trading activities of it or its employees or affiliates in the securities of the profiled company or companies. In order to be in full compliance with the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, Section 17(b) ON THE MARKET is receiving a total of sixty thousand dollars from third parties as compensation for the distribution of this commentary and other advertisements. Since we are receiving compensation in the advertised company there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions and such statements and opinions cannot be considered independent. We encourage you to review the investing information available at the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") website (http://www.sec.gov) and the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") website (http://www.nasdr.com). You can review all public filings by the Company at the SEC's EDGAR page. The NASD website includes helpful investor awareness and educational information.




"watch yer keester"


posts are my opinion only and are not a substitute for doing your own research