InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 957
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/14/2010

Re: kauaikid post# 102110

Thursday, 02/16/2012 7:47:12 PM

Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:47:12 PM

Post# of 103340
most have run for cover.... a token *1* or 2 will continue to deflect and avoid the obvious.. after all.. *their* work is essentially done on this particular SCAM .. it's on to the next one(s).. for a *certain* few who pump via the same mantra...over and over *again*......

The blame is never placed on the scamming JD's of the world... for example...these *enablers* point to conspiracies born through misuse of Finra short data.... these *enablers* go as far as touting the character of these scamming CEO's...and of course the enablers *never* answer direct questions.....for example:


When asked why JD sold the only NET asset(Building & property) which resulted in the rent factor going from a manageable 60K per year to a choking 172K+ per year......NO ANSWER was given..just deflection...that is called enabling.

You can find posts containing the words *orchestrated runs* yet no blame is placed on JD and his cronies despite the fact that these runs were created through tens and tens of false and misleading PR's put out by JD and Glenny "boy"...that is called enabling.

You will find many posts alluding to *multiple* connections to Lowes...these posts were nothing more than innuendo with the SOLE purpose of enabling those dumping the stock.

When the company raised the A/S on multiple occasions the *enablers* offered JD cover by forwarding the idea that these 'bumps' in the A/S were due to a compensation package being prepared for a *new* CEO.....there never was a *new* CEO.... the cover provided is called *enabling*

When these *enablers* were reminded that JD missed multiple deadlines regarding naming the CEO these *enablers* offered up the *excuse* that the *new* CEO was waiting on a balance sheet clean-up...these *enablers* used innuendo which suggested that they had access to *locals* who knew the real story..LOL.....yet the reality was that the company was operating in the DEEP-DEEP RED and was being SUED by suppliers and Banks.....which of course means that the company was insolvent and no balance sheet clean-up was possible.


Many more examples--- the bogus Window World choosing ETC crapinets...this was explained away through a tasteless suggestion that the untimely death of Window Worlds's CEO caused the deal to go south...ywt the Bogus PR was published WELL AFTER the Death of Window World's CEO.......truly *disgusting*

*enablers* kept the ETC Crapinet dream alive despite KNOWING full well that JD had abandoned the patent application AND the trademark application......the list goes on and on.

Pink Sheets...where failing private companies come to die.