BioCurex, Inc.(fka BOCX)

[HALF FULL GLASS]

A post from the past...

I refuse to get into the comparison between RECAF and other markers because Gold Seeker has set up a strategy that no matter what you say, he wins: You can either agree with him, in which case he wins, or you can defend universal cancer markers, in which case he will say that there are two other ones to compete with RECAF.

Anything in between is, of coarse, dismissed. If RECAF is better than the other two, then he will bring up ONE study from another marker and ONE study with RECAF to prove the contrary.

He is unable to address the use of RECAF for monitoring and every time he is confronted with that he goes on a tangent. He has also decided to ignore the two reports that allow for early diagnosis of prostate and breast cancer and moreover, he managed to use that as an argument against RECAF, because if you detect cancer 'too early' (!!!) then you cannot tell which ones will end up killing the patient and which ones will not...

He claims that Moro has the power to convince Abbott, Inverness, the two new board members, investors, etc, while he is the one who has been able to slowly modify reality in this forum to the point we are now arguing whether or not it is better to let cancer grow until it proves itself aggressive and malignant..!!! Total nonsense!