My thoughts were mainly commons against JPM. May be smaller parties, but not JPM in my opinion. Besides, Susman may be precluded from any litigation with GSA parties/releases.
I know you are in the legal field. So you know the time it takes to go after someone with deep pockets especially with conspiracy theories.
Where I work, it is a drain on billable hours and costs/expenses which could amount to years and years.
There is case in my office that is not contingency, but out of "principle", and that is small $$, but it may change the way "XXXX" bills and change the entire legal industry.
NOTE: xxx = I didn't want to put the profession in because I can be found easily from that since a lot of people in the legal field are closely monitoring that case.
imo
