InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 2099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Re: downsideup post# 55447

Wednesday, 02/15/2012 2:11:52 PM

Wednesday, February 15, 2012 2:11:52 PM

Post# of 60937
Clearing title is going to be important. I am not sure criminal issues matter. In addition, anything criminal is exponentially harder to prove than the same thing civilly ... and civilly we get damages. It may be nice to think that people are going to jail but that is not going to get us a greater return.

As for what is best for the receiver (in billable hours), that is a real problem to which I have no great answer for. At least this attorney was not sued for being involved in a scam receivership (at least that I can find).

I believe the argument can be made that, if we have three years to wind down the company, we should continue to pursue the T-Mobile litigation with a contingency attorney. That settles the Diac issue (he gets his 28%) and puts us in a better situation to ultimately sell the patent.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.