InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 1670
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/11/2010

Re: riskon post# 18051

Friday, 02/10/2012 10:46:22 AM

Friday, February 10, 2012 10:46:22 AM

Post# of 61238
Riskon, I respect your posts by not twisting your words or even offering a rebuttle to what you post. I would appreciate it if you didn't do that to mine.

I meant exactly what I said, very proficient in English thank you.

A statement from the company with no supporting evidence does not instill confidence in investors and make them open their pocket books. Cold hard facts that are supported do. I.e. they could have reported the actual numerical data to support their claim that a web presence was needed...surely they researched this or had some figures of their own to back up this need, including that in the PR would have given the claim and need for the web presence more respectability. Like I said, what was the point?

Now, had they PR'd the website AFTER it was online...that would have made sense. It's only a web site, nothing ground breaking there. To be honest I am surprised there wasn't a web presence already, it is pretty much standard for any business.

And as far as the stock price is concerned, I think that is the least of what is confusing investors. In fact the current stock price is what has brought many of the current posters (investors/traders) here to date, including myself.

Frdm.