InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,230.00
(
-0.15%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,254.00
(
0.26%
)
Post# of 7742
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

wallas2g1

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 11
Posts 389
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/23/2011

wallas2g1

Re: fcpgalltheway post# 5286

Thursday, 02/09/2012 4:05:39 PM

Thursday, February 09, 2012 4:05:39 PM

Post# of 7742
It's a matter of semantics and legal terminology.
Not all agreements are enforceable by law. You can have an agreement but not a contract. In this case they will have a contract when all the terms and conditions have been fulfilled. Before then, all they have is an agreement to acquire on paper (negotiations if you will). so "subject to" and "to acquire" mean the same thing in this context.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up