InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 66
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/05/2012

Re: Montanore post# 9242

Wednesday, 02/08/2012 6:14:32 PM

Wednesday, February 08, 2012 6:14:32 PM

Post# of 30704
Thanks, for correcting, 6 oz. per ton. lol
I thought I'd point out his, error.
If in fact there was 6 oz. per ton on the site, well, lets just say it would be a find of the century.
But again i stress, there's been no drilling, no core samples, and the company is basing all their hopes in speculation on a former mine that was adjacent to it, and a few rocks on the ground.
Till they start drilling, and again it takes a lot of drilling to map out an area to know where exactly to mine and where the veins run, then and only then, will this said spider property be a viable mine. Showing a few surface rocks with gold with in them, is a far cry from real.... drilled core samples.... that show the precise measure's / lode, of gold that can be mined.
Perhaps they, should have offered shares in the company to a drilling firm as a trade off, to receive factual core samples, firstly.

Otherwise, its just speculation, and that can go along way, in the eyes of a shareholder, hoping for a pipe dream.
I'd rather see real evidence, and rel drilled core samples, that show the extent of the gold and its depth, in which its runs.
And they haven't gotten to that stage of the game yet.