InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1023
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/11/2011

Re: Snizzle post# 23161

Monday, 02/06/2012 8:04:51 PM

Monday, February 06, 2012 8:04:51 PM

Post# of 95214
I agree we need to keep things real. Its not the end of story when the certain subjects of posts get drounded out in a name or one particular sentense.

Real issue is not if anyone of former shell owns shares, thats normally how it works. But most shells are not like the one chosen by HOWARD..Its what is the pattern of involvement almost a year later that just as many shareholders have a problem with as do those that dont care.And does past practices of PHAR a pattern of non transparency..

Would you agree that legal counsel Joeseph Pittera is the legal counsel for PHARMSTAR Pharmaceuticals? If you disregard names dwelled on in posts today and just consider this one connection still very active in PHAR. Joseph Pittera was also legal counsel that put his rubber stamp on several of DENNIS McLaughlin and entire groups obviously fraudulent scam broke as_ companies and with the subject spoken of today, he has given his stamp of everything is legal and on the up and up with the new scam by DM/KC and group that are large shareholders in PHAR.
How is that not a reason for questioning?? This new scam happening now is by a company that was flat broke,defaulted on loans, robbed investors of hard earned money and PHARS attorney of HOWARDS choosing represents and OK filings as being truthful..But Pittera is good with obviously making lies look truthful. My question im trying to figure out is why does HOWARD need this if all is on the up and up.
Also look at PATB with new scam and PHAR. That puts KIT and DM back in conversation that was being debated today as far as a relevent question of ongoing connection, not just as shareholders.
GLTU