posts vs pps, that is very innovative, I am sure you're only one thinking of that, what other neat little tools did your investors hub package come with?
I am inclined to believe saturated messageboards are distributed evenly among stocks which will either go up or down, therefore rendering any analysis of post-frequency to PPS useless.
Besides that, my interest in this stock is derived from my higher-than-average ability to comprehend the science the company is based upon. Hence, my belief in its success has a more scientific,stable foundation than your statisticians' hocus pocus, with so many confounding variables embedded within it boggles my mind, perhaps you should read 'A Random Walk on Wall Street'.
My confidence is based on the most important core factor which will lead this company to do well, i.e. the merit of the science of cannibinoids themselves. Not some superficial, arbitrary ratio of multi-faceted variables.
