InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 177
Posts 11263
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/04/2011

Re: None

Tuesday, 01/24/2012 2:33:30 PM

Tuesday, January 24, 2012 2:33:30 PM

Post# of 48320
This is in response to your message which I pasted below:

chade014
Monday, January 23, 2012 1:00:14 PM
Re: WallStreet007 post# 39365
Post #39366
Quote:
The information is there, for some of us it might have been easier, but perhaps others should have thought such things through before they burned bridges.

From chade: The only bridge you are talking about is the one investor that talks to Steven on a daily basis. That is insider info. And I have proof Steven talks to his big investors.

There NO is public DD to be found out about the track nor the company's FUTURE projects.




This is what I would like to say in regards to your message chade:

I would imagine you would have first hand knowledge regarding the sharing of insider information and there are plenty of emails that can be shared to prove that.

I suppose that was ok back then, but now you see at as problem since you are at odds with the company because you handed over $10k to a complete stranger for shares you wanted to quickly flip, who you later found out and mentioned on this board to be a very unscrupulous character. You would think a quick background check would have been in order BEFORE you wrote him a check for $10k and not afterwards. I assume you thought since Steven introduced the seller of those shares to you that he would surely assume all resposibility, since you had such a close insider relationship.

I also suppose you will once again claim that I received 150k shares and it is in the financials, which I find very humorous to say the least, because it is completely false. You will most likely once again avoid addressing this by using more false accusations toward me, even though I have addressed every issue put forth by you and others. At least I came forth and admitted what I left out of my review and why, along with other details. It would just seem logical that you should do the same unless you are hiding something.

Eventually those people who are oblivious to this will figure out that you were trying to use every advantage possible to stay ahead of all us other investors until you got burned. Maybe that is why you invested so much here.

Sounds to me that your information is greatly distorted in some areas and being used to attack Mr. Swank due to your poor judgement in a private stock deal that you wanted to use to make money at the expense of all the CGAQ investors, which was proven by the very documents you shared on this board.

I have emails from another investor on this board that clearly shows that you were in direct contact with CGAQ on a regular basis and knew what they were working on before any of us other investors were.

Oh wait, I think instead of addressing the issue, you will just claim that I got paid to write a good review. Your game plan didn't work as you thought and you are embarrassed by the fact you lost $10k in a manner that you would not care to discuss further in detail.

Were you made aware way back before any mention of the race track that CGAQ was working on trying to make a deal to get the racetrack?

Funny isn't it that now you do not like the fact that you think someone else is now in the loop and you are not, because of your burned bridges.

Regardless, whatever happens from here on out you will only be guessing and attacking for revenge and nothing more.

Cheers!