I was wondering. Why do you state "Better than Expected Results" in relation to the assays (Brooklyn & King Solomon) and the NI 43-101 (Uranium Claims).
Do you consider it imperitive that the results be better than expected? I understand that findings "in line with what is expected" would not have the same impact as "Better Than......". Does that mean findings at an "expected" level would not be good?
I just had to throw that out there to see what your perspective was (based upon my questions) in relation to what you stated.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.