InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 52
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/16/2011

Re: point3 post# 916

Sunday, 01/22/2012 10:34:03 AM

Sunday, January 22, 2012 10:34:03 AM

Post# of 1761
We now see more interesting behavior by Tara the lawyer of Tara has hired the lawyer in Texas to protect Claridge and Eaddy the crooks that stole from CME and ran off to Tara

Now why is it that Tara is paying for the defense of Claridge it's for certain because Claridge was doing Tara dirty work when they breached the agreement of employment at CME

I am sure Tara is trying to stop the action as the discovery will leave a dirty trail to the door of Rich and Tara

Why is Tara using it dwindling cash to pay for a case that is between CME and it's employees ???????? This case as stated to date does not have Tara as part of it so why is Tara lawyer working for past employees of CME

We can be sure like the Mafia when one of the crews cronies gets caught they bail them out and they hire a lawyer so that the guy that got caught does not rat out the big Boss in Chicago

Of course the big boss is actually a guy running the company out of his garage in this case but he is spending Tara funds to protect people in a action that Tara is not named in why why why we all can ask

Mr Terry colfing is the lawyer of Tara from Las Vegas

-----Original Message-----
From: ecf_txnd <ecf_txnd@txnd.uscourts.gov>
To: Courtmail <Courtmail@txnd.uscourts.gov>
Sent: Fri, Jan 20, 2012 9:27 am
Subject: Activity in Case 3:11-cv-03540-M CME Operations LLC et al v. Claridge et al Order for Scheduling Order Proposal

This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
I

The following transaction was entered on 1/20/2012 at 9:26 AM CST and filed on 1/19/2012
Case Name: CME Operations LLC et al v. Claridge et al
Case Number: 3:11-cv-03540-M
Filer:
Document Number: 12
Docket Text:
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: Proposed Scheduling Order due by 2/29/2012. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 1/19/2012) (Attachments: # (1) Consent Letter, # (2) Consent Form) (cea)

3:11-cv-03540-M Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Frank W Hill fhill@hillgilstrap.com, sklein@hillgilstrap.com, snash@hillgilstrap.com

Martha Hardwick Hofmeister mhofmeister@shacklaw.net, mwillhite@shacklaw.net

Robert F Kemp lawyerkemp@cs.com, charleshanna@lawyerkemp.com

Steven R Pierret spierret@hillgilstrap.com, kftak@hillgilstrap.com

Richard J Deaguero rjdeaguerolaw@yahoo.com

Derek D Rollins drollins@shacklaw.net, khickman@shacklaw.net

David Thomas Duncan dduncan@maclaw.com, nknilans@maclaw.com

Terry A Coffing tcoffing@maclaw.com

3:11-cv-03540-M Notice required by federal rule will be delivered by other means (as detailed in the Clerk's records for orders/judgments) to:
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document description:Main Document
Original filename:n/a
Electronic document Stamp:
[STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1004035775 [Date=