InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 2099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Re: THE_BAMFACTSTER!! post# 53968

Friday, 01/20/2012 4:38:06 PM

Friday, January 20, 2012 4:38:06 PM

Post# of 60937
Out of all the e-mails that were offered as evidence to the Court in Delaware regarding Williams alleged attempts to destroy the company not a single one references a licensing deal that management had on the table that Williams vetoed. Nor were there any where Williams threatened to sue the company offering the licensing deal if we dealt with them.

I would think that if this is management's one big chance to make the case that Williams is a bad man, which is pretty much the gist of the e-mails that were offered, then they would have included them. If they wanted to make the case that Williams is toxic to the company then evidence that he was threatening to sue potential licensees would be relevant evidence.

Problem is there is no evidence to support that claim because that claim is false.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.