InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 5209
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/11/2011

Re: A deleted message

Thursday, 01/19/2012 9:11:22 PM

Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:11:22 PM

Post# of 3562
You asked, "Who said Tapiwa is legally the same as LLSR?"

Why, YOU did, you said, "Tapiwa... the "T" in TAG owns 33% of TAG Minerals Inc.... the "G" in TAG owns 33% of TAG Minerals Inc... and the "A" in TAG owns 33% of TAG Minerals Inc. However, LLSR owns 100% of TAG Minerals Inc."

Tapiwa CAN'T POSSIBLY own 33% of TAG if LLSR owns 100% of TAG and LLSR CAN'T POSSIBLY own 100% of TAG if Tapiwa owns 33% unless you are arguing that LLSR and Tapiwa are the same entity.

Individual officers and directors are not synonymous with the company and cannot be used interchangeably even if their initials are in the name. They can and do have holdings that are separate from the company's.

Just another reason this smells fishy. Unless you're a fan of 133% ownership.



Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.